Walleye | Avengers: Movie No. 3 all-time
It was expected to happen for a few weeks, and now it happened: Revenues of "The Avengers" in recent days have raised him to the third spot on the list of most profitable films of all time. This film also came the American table (which he dismissed the "Dark Knight"), and the table rule - World (which he topped the "Harry Potter io9 and the Deathly Hallows, Part 2" was here for less than a year). Income "Avengers" in North America alone 538 million. Worldwide revenues: $ 1.33 billion.
Top two are still, and there remain two films of James Cameron - "Avatar" and "Titanic." As S"hnokmim "successful, is probably not going to qualify first or second place all-time. Standard just too big: the global table, in "The Avengers" and "Titanic" - that distribution of his renewed this year pushed him further up - separated more than 850 million.
Worth mentioning, as every time talking about POS records io9 of all time, that this is the dollar, not the spectators. "Titanic," "Avatar" and "hnokmim "are the films that brought the most money, but not the most sold movie tickets: table number cards valued sold every movie," The Avengers "currently rated a little below" the third day "and" Spider-Man io9 " , and a film comes close ankles of "Gone with the Wind."
?
12 you can lose right now, it will not happen. Red Fish in -02/06/2012 20:58
Horican?
1
But whatever. The Dark Knight Rise probably be a little less sympathetic to the general public, women and children, the films at the top of the table at the moment. Avatar and Lawng'rs I went with the whole family, including my mother and my little brother. io9 The Dark Knight I would not even attempt to take them. It is also not screened in three dimensions. So he will not break * all * records. Never mind, I'm not worried about him. I'm sure he will earn enough.
He already knows that he loves him with all his might (although only individuals around the world had the opportunity to watch a movie, io9 if at all), he just expects the audience to be conducted in accordance with and flood the halls movie crowds like me.
Really comes L"awng'rs "the money, io9 he got it right. Impressive achievement I'm happy that happened.
I doubt Crescendo Dark Knight "will override the" Avengers ". The main reason is that it is not three - dimensional. Far as it pleases, says he probably put a little less, because all three card - This dimension few extra dollars, which when multiplied by the amount of people ... it's hard to see how the film could come close to this amount, though it is Nolan and Batman and all. He must break some records, and I think probably reach the Top 10. But he did not oust the Whedon and Cameron from the top.
Reply
I think of those who only have a chance to go through the "Awng'rs" (in terms of breaking records) and "awtar "(in terms of the most successful film ever) names that come to mind are" Awng'rs 2 "and io9 "awtar 2". What makes Whedon and Cameron kings of the world!
No, but Na'vi avatar was the interest in three - dimensionality revolutionary Daniel io9 in -03/06/2012 01:46
Whoever wins this avatar inflation and population growth - when the price of the tickets will reach $ 20, hit the order of "The Avengers" could present higher income avatar. io9 Even Avatar is only ranked 14th all-time selling tickets.
Time as innumerable movies cool we did not even occur to us. Easy to think that what happened is all you need to know. And if we can not think of anything io9 specific more successful, probably will not like this. Just what, things have not happened does not really care about it's hard for us to imagine them.
In such a case can also be vinyl album more successful in the 21st century io9 than in the 80s, or the shareholders of Ainstagrm rich as Rockefeller (who also had property valued at billion).
But remember comparing the "Gone With the Wind" contemporary films it a bit unfair for contemporary films; Gone with the Wind "of the period could only watch movies. Bauong'rz people can watch at home, whether legally or not.
Also because less popular movies are now 50-60 years ago. It is true that competition is "unfair" (Star Wars, for example, is not necessarily better than the movies stunts after, and sold less tickets), but if you want an objective measure of success, selling tickets is the best indicator.
By the way - the difference is not that you can watch a movie at home, but you can expect something at home. That is, people are not going to fewer movies io9 because they're going to watch the same movie at home, they are just watching TV rather than going to the movies (regardless of content). I see many people around me rarely see movies io9 in any format whatsoever.
You mean to north cinema or watched all formats? Nimrod in -03/06/2012 17:44
Theaters io9 difference between the number of tickets overall number io9 of viewers is negligible. If you talk about all formats - these numbers have been difficult to calculate accurately, and yet there is a difference between io9 watching a home movie theater. io9 It is worth remembering that before the era of classics io9 who were spending all video formats io9 and television broadcasts endless times (and you can see the original io9 Star Wars trilogy is still a part of popular culture most people born after she left).
In summary - the number of cards more relevant to the amount of dollars. Number of spectators general all formats and perhaps more relevant TV, but you can not calculate it (my wild card - if there was such a number, perhaps Star Wars was rising to first place at the expense of Gone with the Wind at least talk to the generations born since).
Film was still very new then. Especially film talks. Especially io9 film talks and color. io9 Add this popular story and great game and what not, and you've got an amazing hit. But most most importantly - he had little competition. How many more movies out at the time? How long is the run? These were collected
It was expected to happen for a few weeks, and now it happened: Revenues of "The Avengers" in recent days have raised him to the third spot on the list of most profitable films of all time. This film also came the American table (which he dismissed the "Dark Knight"), and the table rule - World (which he topped the "Harry Potter io9 and the Deathly Hallows, Part 2" was here for less than a year). Income "Avengers" in North America alone 538 million. Worldwide revenues: $ 1.33 billion.
Top two are still, and there remain two films of James Cameron - "Avatar" and "Titanic." As S"hnokmim "successful, is probably not going to qualify first or second place all-time. Standard just too big: the global table, in "The Avengers" and "Titanic" - that distribution of his renewed this year pushed him further up - separated more than 850 million.
Worth mentioning, as every time talking about POS records io9 of all time, that this is the dollar, not the spectators. "Titanic," "Avatar" and "hnokmim "are the films that brought the most money, but not the most sold movie tickets: table number cards valued sold every movie," The Avengers "currently rated a little below" the third day "and" Spider-Man io9 " , and a film comes close ankles of "Gone with the Wind."
?
12 you can lose right now, it will not happen. Red Fish in -02/06/2012 20:58
Horican?
1
But whatever. The Dark Knight Rise probably be a little less sympathetic to the general public, women and children, the films at the top of the table at the moment. Avatar and Lawng'rs I went with the whole family, including my mother and my little brother. io9 The Dark Knight I would not even attempt to take them. It is also not screened in three dimensions. So he will not break * all * records. Never mind, I'm not worried about him. I'm sure he will earn enough.
He already knows that he loves him with all his might (although only individuals around the world had the opportunity to watch a movie, io9 if at all), he just expects the audience to be conducted in accordance with and flood the halls movie crowds like me.
Really comes L"awng'rs "the money, io9 he got it right. Impressive achievement I'm happy that happened.
I doubt Crescendo Dark Knight "will override the" Avengers ". The main reason is that it is not three - dimensional. Far as it pleases, says he probably put a little less, because all three card - This dimension few extra dollars, which when multiplied by the amount of people ... it's hard to see how the film could come close to this amount, though it is Nolan and Batman and all. He must break some records, and I think probably reach the Top 10. But he did not oust the Whedon and Cameron from the top.
Reply
I think of those who only have a chance to go through the "Awng'rs" (in terms of breaking records) and "awtar "(in terms of the most successful film ever) names that come to mind are" Awng'rs 2 "and io9 "awtar 2". What makes Whedon and Cameron kings of the world!
No, but Na'vi avatar was the interest in three - dimensionality revolutionary Daniel io9 in -03/06/2012 01:46
Whoever wins this avatar inflation and population growth - when the price of the tickets will reach $ 20, hit the order of "The Avengers" could present higher income avatar. io9 Even Avatar is only ranked 14th all-time selling tickets.
Time as innumerable movies cool we did not even occur to us. Easy to think that what happened is all you need to know. And if we can not think of anything io9 specific more successful, probably will not like this. Just what, things have not happened does not really care about it's hard for us to imagine them.
In such a case can also be vinyl album more successful in the 21st century io9 than in the 80s, or the shareholders of Ainstagrm rich as Rockefeller (who also had property valued at billion).
But remember comparing the "Gone With the Wind" contemporary films it a bit unfair for contemporary films; Gone with the Wind "of the period could only watch movies. Bauong'rz people can watch at home, whether legally or not.
Also because less popular movies are now 50-60 years ago. It is true that competition is "unfair" (Star Wars, for example, is not necessarily better than the movies stunts after, and sold less tickets), but if you want an objective measure of success, selling tickets is the best indicator.
By the way - the difference is not that you can watch a movie at home, but you can expect something at home. That is, people are not going to fewer movies io9 because they're going to watch the same movie at home, they are just watching TV rather than going to the movies (regardless of content). I see many people around me rarely see movies io9 in any format whatsoever.
You mean to north cinema or watched all formats? Nimrod in -03/06/2012 17:44
Theaters io9 difference between the number of tickets overall number io9 of viewers is negligible. If you talk about all formats - these numbers have been difficult to calculate accurately, and yet there is a difference between io9 watching a home movie theater. io9 It is worth remembering that before the era of classics io9 who were spending all video formats io9 and television broadcasts endless times (and you can see the original io9 Star Wars trilogy is still a part of popular culture most people born after she left).
In summary - the number of cards more relevant to the amount of dollars. Number of spectators general all formats and perhaps more relevant TV, but you can not calculate it (my wild card - if there was such a number, perhaps Star Wars was rising to first place at the expense of Gone with the Wind at least talk to the generations born since).
Film was still very new then. Especially film talks. Especially io9 film talks and color. io9 Add this popular story and great game and what not, and you've got an amazing hit. But most most importantly - he had little competition. How many more movies out at the time? How long is the run? These were collected
No comments:
Post a Comment